
[Download PDF ↓](/docs/legal_knowing_machines/The_Right_of_Publicity_A_New_Framework_for_Regulating_Facial_Rec.pdf) 



For over a century, the right of publicity (ROP) has protected individuals from unwanted commercial exploitation of their images and identities. Originating around the turn of the Twentieth Century in response to the newest image-appropriation technologies of the time, including portrait photography, mass-production packaging, and a ubiquitous printing press, the ROP has continued to evolve along with each new wave of technologies that enable companies to exploit peoples’ images and identities for commercial gain. Over time, the ROP has protected individuals from misappropriation in photographs, films, advertisements, action figures, baseball cards, animatronic robots, video game avatars, and even digital resurrection in film sequels. Critically, as new technologies gained capacity for mass appropriation, the ROP expanded to protect against these practices.

The newest example of such a technology is facial recognition (FR). Facial recognition systems derive their primary economic value from commercially exploiting massive facial image databases filled with millions of individual likenesses and identities, often obtained without sufficient consent. Such appropriations go beyond mere acquisition, playing critical roles in training FR algorithms, matching identities to new images, and displaying results to users. Without the capacity to appropriate and commercially exploit these images and identities, most FR systems would fail to function as commercial products.

In this article, I develop a novel theory for how ROP claims could apply to FR systems and detail how their history and development, both statutory and common law, demonstrate their power to impose liability on entities that conduct mass image and identity appropriation, especially through innovative visual technologies. This provides a robust framework for FR regulation while at the same time balancing issues of informed consent and various public interest concerns, such as compatibility with copyright law and First Amendment-protected news reporting. 

Knowing Legal Machines

Generative AI Legal Explainer

Comments of the Knowing Machines Research Project to the United States Copyright Office Notice of Inquiry on Artificial Intelligence and Copyright

Amici Brief of Science, Legal, and Technology Scholars in Renderos et al. v. Clearview AI, Inc. et al., No. RG21096898 (Superior Ct. Alameda County)

Clearview AI Is Deploying a California Law Meant to Protect Activists From Bogus Lawsuits

The First Amendment Should Protect Us from Facial Recognition Technologies – Not the Other Way Around

The Right of Publicity: A New Framework for Regulating Facial Recognition

Freedom of Information Laws and Access to Government Data in the Age of AI: Two Recent Cases

Comments of the Knowing Machines Research Project to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy on Automated Worker Surveillance and Management

Tell the White House to Limit AI-Driven Worker Surveillance

Comments of the Knowing Machines Research Project to the Federal Trade Commission